Law and Politics Book Review: About LPBRThis guide is designed as an introduction to finding book reviews, particularly in law-related areas. It focues more on book reviews for scholars as opposed to librarians for purchase decisions. For more sources on finding book reviews particularly on older titles before the 's, see Finding Book Reviews FAS. This guide focuses very much on US and English-language books. For non-US books originally published in the vernacular, sometimes national bibliographies, regional studies databases, newspapers and other resources for the particular country.
Politics Book Review: Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society by Gary C...
Law and Politics Book Review
New York: Routledge, ISBN Email: jrmerriam loyola. In the first half of the 20th century, progressives criticized robust judicial review as a threat to democratic governance, whereas conservatives defended judicial intervention as a constitutionally proper means of modulating popular impulses. During this period, the American Left-Right division, particularly as applied to judicial politics and constitutional law, was defined largely according to economic issues.
This book deals with the interdisciplinary connections of the study of law and politics. It discusses jurisprudence and the philosophy of law, constitutional law, politics and theory, judicial politics, and law and society. The book reviews three prominent traditions in the empirical analysis of law and politics and, indeed, politics more broadly: judicial behavior, strategic action, and historical institutionalism. It also focuses on questions of law and courts in a global context and on how law constitutes and orders political and social relationships. Moreover, the book: examines how courts, politics, and society have intersected in the United States; reviews several recent interdisciplinary movements in the study of law and politics and how they intersect with and are of interest to political science; and offers personal perspectives on how the study of law and politics has developed over the past generation, and where it might be headed in the next. Keywords: United States , politics , law , jurisprudence , judicial politics , constitutional law , judicial behavior , courts , society , political science.
Edited by Gregory A. Caldeira, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Keith E. Whittington
Politics Book Review: The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT...
About LPBR. Reviews are published frequently, and readers are notified by e-mail as new ones are available. The section has a membership of almost and presently sends the Review to over 1, readers in 39 countries. The electronic medium enables us to review almost every book about the legal process and politics, to do longer reviews than are usually published, and to make the reviews available within six months of our receipt of the book. LPBR Review Essays The Law and Politics Book Review will consider for publication thematic essays that address important substantive, theoretical, or methodological issues of interest to its subscribers. An essay may rest on one or several books to develop its theme. The books may be recently published or out-of-print as long as they are readily available in university or college libraries.
What shapes the role of constitutional courts in new democracies? What drives the rise of judicial power in emerging constitutional orders? The book offers a fascinating insight into the creation and development of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia and the judicial personalities behind its leadership, with a particular focus on the role of the founding chief justice Jimly Asshiddiqie. Importantly, it also contributes to broader debates in comparative constitutional studies on the emergence of constitutional courts and the consolidation of judicial power in new democratic orders. As Rosalind Dixon and Samuel Issacharoff describe, deferral-based techniques used by courts can be explicit or implicit.
New York: Oxford University Press, Email: mromano su. One of the most contentious debates between scholars of state courts and legal academics has been examining which institutions of judicial selection and retention better elevate accountability over independence and vice versa. Geyh replaces rigid orthodoxy with introspection to draw new attention to the debate over how to design judicial institutions; his focus on the pros and cons of both sides of the debate is valuable as it requires the reader to engage rather than isolate themselves in their own ideological bubble. What Geyh tries to do, through in-depth research into the histories of institutional change as well as engagement with countless years of empirical research, is to find the line between what we currently have evidence to support and disprove about the stigma of judicial elections, and to consider a new way forward for institutional designers concerned about the judiciary.