Luther's canon - WikipediaBut many people know Martin Luther's opinion of the book, or think they do, and wonder whether James is really to be placed on the same level as the Gospels or Paul's letters. He famously described James as "an epistle of straw", because it talked about law and good deeds rather than faith, the keystone of Luther's theology: "You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone" James Luther wrote that John's Gospel and his first letter, Paul's letters and Peter's first letter "are the books that show you Christ and teach you all that is necessary and salvatory for you to know, even if you were never to see or hear any other book or doctrine". James, however, he thinks "is really an epistle of straw, compared to these others, for it has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it". But does that mean he didn't think it was any good?
History of The King James Bible: God's Perfect Word
Should James be in the Bible? Martin Luther didn't think so
Answer: Martin Luther was born in in the town of Eisleben, Germany. He is known for nailing his "95 Theses" to the door of a Catholic church on Halloween in His hope was that the church would change some of its practices and doctrines he felt were not right. The Catholics, however, did not appreciate Luther's criticisms to put it mildly and soon excommunicated him. His efforts, along with others, were the catalysts for what is called the Protestant Reformation. Several religious and other kinds of encyclopedias offer various explanations regarding why Martin Luther at least during part of his life did not like the book of James. First, however, according to one Biblical Commentary, His opinion of the book written in his preface to the New Testament was as follows.
The Catholics, however, did not appreciate Luther's criticisms (to put it mildly) and Martin Luther (at least during part of his life) did not like the book of James.
unleash the warrior within pdf
Paul's epistles weren't written by Paul but by Marcion and then a proto-Catholic added a bunch of OT quotations to them and some light orthodox material to clean them up a bit. Its time for "Paul" to go. Paul Sceptic, I see a pattern to your comments. I don't have time to engage you in your crusade. Luther rejected part of the NT writings for the same reason he rejected the OT books not in the Hebrew: no universal [both geographical and historical] patristic consensus. And he also fancied they were both wrong both sets of books because they preached what he took to be "another Gospel" James, Tobit, 2 Maccbees: all taught in his opinion what he called works-righteouness. Yet other were fables, frauds, or fabrications.
Luther's canon is the biblical canon attributed to Martin Luther , which has influenced Protestants since the 16th-century Protestant Reformation. While the Lutheran Confessions  specifically did not define a canon, it is widely regarded as the canon of the Lutheran Church. It differs from the Roman Catholic canon of the Council of Trent in that it rejects the Deuterocanonical books and questions the seven New Testament books, called "Luther's Antilegomena ",  four of which are still ordered last in German-language Luther Bibles to this day. Luther included the deuterocanonical books in his translation of the German Bible, but he did relocate them to after the Old Testament , calling them "Apocrypha, that are books which are not considered equal to the Holy Scriptures, but are useful and good to read. Luther made an attempt to remove the books of Hebrews , James , Jude and Revelation from the canon notably, he perceived them to go against certain Protestant doctrines such as sola gratia and sola fide [ citation needed ] but his followers did not generally accept Luther's personal judgment in this matter. However, these books are ordered last in the German-language Luther Bible to this day. Some Catholic sources state and certain historians contend that until the definition of the Council of Trent issued on April 8, , the Roman Catholic Church had not yet dogmatically defined the contents of the biblical canon for Catholics and thus settled the matter.